Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 144% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - 110 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Megaport - €15.45 vs €18.87 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than Gaming - €849.0 vs €1699.0
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1162 minutes ago
44th Variation
FPS
45
40.909090909090914%
Value, €/FPS
€18.87/FPS
81.87599364069952%
Price, €
€849
100%
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
5th Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
40.85249042145593%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
31.768837803320565%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i5-13600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2747
100%
Multi-Core
15415
100%
CPU Winner
44th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
77.21150345831816%
Multi-Core
9729
63.11385014596173%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-13600KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |