Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - 173 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1439.0 vs €1449.0
- Up to 14% better value when playing No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - €8.32 vs €9.66 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12883 minutes ago
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12883 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
44th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
44th Variation
Radeon RX 7700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
62%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900 | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
