Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 60% better in Dead Space than EMCA4 - 99 vs 62 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 44% cheaper than Gaming - €799.0 vs €1439.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Dead Space than Gaming - €12.89 vs €14.54 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77173 minutes ago
48th Variation
FPS
62
62.62626262626263%
Value, €/FPS
€12.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
44th Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
44th Variation
Radeon RX 7700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
244.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
549.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
34.93038493038493%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
36.2147406733394%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
48th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
75.10623229461756%
Multi-Core
9729
58.107865973839814%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 7700 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
