Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 111% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 57 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing Starfield than EMCA4 - €26.3 vs €32.56 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than Gaming - €879.0 vs €1499.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 466 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
27
47.368421052631575%
Value, €/FPS
€32.56/FPS
80.77395577395578%
Price, €
€879
100%
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
42nd Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
42nd Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
52.16459494213459%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
59.12208504801097%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
42nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
66.25354107648725%
Multi-Core
7692
45.941587529116646%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
