Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 24% better in Deathloop than EMCA4 - 125 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1299.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Deathloop than EMCA4 - €10.39 vs €16.33 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
101
80.80000000000001%
Value, €/FPS
€16.33/FPS
63.62522963870178%
Price, €
€1649
78%
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
41st Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
41st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
50.6215173596228%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
40.500685871056234%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
41st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
3.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1927
62.14124475975492%
Multi-Core
10267
48.89047619047619%
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
