Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 77 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than EMCA4 - €2499.0 vs €2599.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Starfield than EMCA4 - €32.45 vs €35.6 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Buy for €2,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
30th Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
30th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
30th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
4.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2918
93%
Multi-Core
19633
93%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
