Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 128% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 153 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €9.14 vs €11.03 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than Gaming - €739.0 vs €1399.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
67
43.790849673202615%
Value, €/FPS
€11.03/FPS
82.8649138712602%
Price, €
€739
100%
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
33rd Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
33rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
43.08080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
35.894660894660895%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
33rd Variation
Core i5-14400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2350
100%
Multi-Core
11359
100%
CPU Winner
31st Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
66.17021276595744%
Multi-Core
6199
54.57346597411744%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-14400F | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |