Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than EMCA4 - 289 vs 255 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 35% cheaper than Gaming - €2459.0 vs €3799.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing F1 22 than Gaming - €9.64 vs €13.15 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
32nd Variation
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.15/FPS
73.30798479087453%
Price, €
€3799
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 556 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
255
88.23529411764706%
Value, €/FPS
€9.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2459
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €2,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 556 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
32nd Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
64.3968432919955%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
63.25581395348837%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900K | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
