Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 37% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EMCA4 - 107 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EMCA4 - €15.88 vs €19.86 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than Gaming - €1549.0 vs €1699.0
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1095 minutes ago
Buy for €1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
23rd Variation
36th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
23rd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
36th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
34%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
56%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
36th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600X
4.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2863
100%
Multi-Core
12807
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 7600X |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
