Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 130% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Megaport - 122 vs 53 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 67% cheaper than Gaming - €749.0 vs €2299.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Gaming - €14.13 vs €18.84 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75216 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
53
43.44262295081967%
Value, €/FPS
€14.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
25th Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
25th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
30.399144689950102%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
26.132632961260672%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
25th Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
31st Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
52.286482851378615%
Multi-Core
6199
30.767321818542783%
Gaming PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
