Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 56% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 429 vs 275 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than Gaming - €879.0 vs €1759.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Gaming - €3.2 vs €4.1 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,759 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1139 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
275
64.1025641025641%
Value, €/FPS
€3.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€879
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
24th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
24th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.83080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75.71365832235398%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
24th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
68.81206325855094%
Multi-Core
7692
50.69865541787504%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
