Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 46% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 35 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Starfield than EMCA4 - €34.26 vs €34.54 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 31% cheaper than Gaming - €829.0 vs €1199.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 391 minutes ago
54th Variation
FPS
24
68.57142857142857%
Value, €/FPS
€34.54/FPS
99.18934568616096%
Price, €
€829
100%
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 382 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
54th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
54th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71.31642512077295%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
74.41713925645873%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
54th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
89.79678238780694%
Multi-Core
9729
84.4018391602325%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
