Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 30% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 232 vs 179 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than Gaming - €1099.0 vs €2099.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Gaming - €6.14 vs €9.05 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €2,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 807 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
179
77.15517241379311%
Value, €/FPS
€6.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 807 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
19th Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
19th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
83.14326443335709%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
76.58568614576494%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
19th Variation
Core i5-13500
2.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2403
100%
Multi-Core
12346
100%
CPU Winner
31st Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
90.63670411985018%
Multi-Core
10263
83.12813866839463%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13500 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
