Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than EMCA4 - 98 vs 95 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 25% cheaper than Gaming - €1099.0 vs €1459.0
- Up to 22% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Gaming - €11.57 vs €14.89 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,459 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 476 minutes ago
41st Variation
FPS
95
96.93877551020408%
Value, €/FPS
€11.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 474 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
16th Variation
41st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
41st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Core i5-13600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2747
100%
Multi-Core
15415
100%
CPU Winner
41st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
77.21150345831816%
Multi-Core
9729
63.11385014596173%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
