Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 32% better in No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - 172 vs 130 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 45% cheaper than Gaming - €879.0 vs €1599.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Gaming - €6.76 vs €9.3 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
130
75.5813953488372%
Value, €/FPS
€6.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€879
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
15th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
15th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.83080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75.71365832235398%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
15th Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
70.2063789868668%
Multi-Core
7692
51.80495689655172%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
