Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 4% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 80 vs 77 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 25% cheaper than Gaming - €749.00 vs €999.00
- Up to 22% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Gaming - €9.73 vs €12.49 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 481 minutes ago
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 481 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
3rd Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2402
100%
Multi-Core
11831
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
