Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 82% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 516 vs 283 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 54% cheaper than Gaming - €829.0 vs €1799.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Gaming - €2.93 vs €3.49 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
10th Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
25%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
29%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
