Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive Gaming e Rendering on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 59% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Gaming e Rendering - 89 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Gaming e Rendering - €1339.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Gaming e Rendering - €15.04 vs €29.45 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
56
62.92134831460674%
Value, €/FPS
€29.45/FPS
51.06960950764007%
Price, €
€1649
81%
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43681 minutes ago
Buy for €1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
53.8510101010101%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
43.697848045674135%
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
null-core
Single-Core
2178
80.25055268975682%
Multi-Core
10263
62.4802142944113%
Gaming e Rendering PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
