Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Gaming e Rendering on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 28% better in No Man's Sky than Gaming e Rendering - 155 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Gaming e Rendering - €1399.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Gaming e Rendering - €9.03 vs €13.63 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 410 minutes ago
32nd Variation
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
null-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming e Rendering PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |