Key Differences
In short — Gaming e Rendering outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming e Rendering PC
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 29 vs 27 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 47% cheaper than Gaming e Rendering - €879.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Starfield than Gaming e Rendering - €32.56 vs €56.86 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53880 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
27
93.10344827586206%
Value, €/FPS
€32.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€879
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53880 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
70.09038619556286%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
57.71461716937355%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
68.9388356669123%
Multi-Core
7692
46.82819919639596%
Gaming e Rendering PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
