Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Gaming e Rendering on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 21% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Gaming e Rendering - 92 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Gaming e Rendering - €979.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Gaming e Rendering - €10.64 vs €21.7 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
76
82.6086956521739%
Value, €/FPS
€21.7/FPS
49.032258064516135%
Price, €
€1649
59%
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56645 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
92
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€979
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56645 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
70.09038619556286%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
57.71461716937355%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
78.15033161385408%
Multi-Core
9729
59.22927066845245%
Gaming e Rendering PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
