Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms GameMachines Neo - on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GameMachines Neo - - 195 vs 152 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
5th Variation
12th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
56%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
60%
GPU Winner
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
12th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
4.5 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2938
99%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
GameMachines Neo - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-14700KF | CPU | Ryzen 9 7950X |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |