Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive GameMachines Cyclon - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 35% better in No Man's Sky than GameMachines Cyclon - - 169 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than GameMachines Cyclon - - €1099.0 vs €1249.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing No Man's Sky than GameMachines Cyclon - - €6.5 vs €9.99 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
125
73.96449704142012%
Value, €/FPS
€9.99/FPS
65.06506506506507%
Price, €
€1249
87%
Buy for €1,249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48003 minutes ago
31st Variation
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
50.6215173596228%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
40.500685871056234%
31st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
null-core
Single-Core
2178
92.20999153259949%
Multi-Core
10263
89.03444087793875%
GameMachines Cyclon - PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
