Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cyber - outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cyber - PC
- Performs up to 13100% better in Overwatch 2 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 132 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 98% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €11.13 vs €729.0 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 50% cheaper than GameMachines Cyber - - €729.0 vs €1469.0
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
1st Variation
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1469
49%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,469 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74732 minutes ago
FPS
1
0.7575757575757576%
Value, €/FPS
€729/FPS
1.5267489711934157%
Price, €
€729
100%
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
Radeon RX 6600
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
159.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
279 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1.016311166875784%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
2.3225806451612905%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
100%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cyber - PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
Radeon RX 6600 | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |