Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive GameMachines Cube - on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 17% better in Dead Space than GameMachines Cube - - 95 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than GameMachines Cube - - €1349.0 vs €1589.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dead Space than GameMachines Cube - - €14.2 vs €19.62 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,589 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1073 minutes ago
Buy for €1,349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 501 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75%
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
