Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EXTREMEBIT outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EXTREMEBIT PC
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EMCA4 - 73 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EMCA4 - €13.70 vs €14.02 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 20% cheaper than EXTREMEBIT - €799.00 vs €999.90
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €999.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
1st Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i5-13400
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2287
100%
Multi-Core
10364
100%
CPU Winner
EXTREMEBIT PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-13400 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |