Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper ERAZER on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of ERAZER Desktop PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than Megaport - €736.31 vs €1269.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €16.73 vs €17.38 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 66% better in Dead Space than ERAZER - 73 vs 44 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
FPS
44
60.273972602739725%
Value, €/FPS
€16.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€736.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €736.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3936 minutes ago
47th Variation
FPS
73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.38/FPS
96.26006904487919%
Price, €
€1269
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
47th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45.114309906858594%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39.475021168501264%
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
null-core
Single-Core
2191
86.73792557403009%
Multi-Core
8910
65.76131079784486%
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i7-12700KF |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
