Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper ERAZER on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ERAZER Desktop PC
- Up to 57% cheaper than EMCA4 - €752.31 vs €1769.0
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 199% better in No Man's Sky than ERAZER - 200 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ERAZER - €8.85 vs €11.23 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
FPS
67
33.5%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
78.80676758682101%
Price, €
€752.31
100%
Buy for €752.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244100 minutes ago
51st Variation
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1769
42%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76010 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
51st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
11.592689295039165%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
11.591248135256091%
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
82.21388367729831%
Multi-Core
8910
60.00808189655172%
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
ERAZER Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Core i5-13600K |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
