Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 51% cheaper than Megaport - €829.0 vs €1699.0
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 125% better in Starfield than EMCA4 - 54 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing Starfield than EMCA4 - €31.46 vs €34.54 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
54th Variation
FPS
24
44.44444444444444%
Value, €/FPS
€34.54/FPS
91.0828025477707%
Price, €
€829
100%
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
54th Variation
46th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
54th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
59.64646464646465%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
42.60461760461761%
46th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
54th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
83.43823760818253%
Multi-Core
9729
65.37867078825347%
46th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
