Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 19% better in Dead Space than Megaport - 126 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Megaport - €1579.00 vs €1829.00
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €12.53 vs €17.25 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
52nd Variation
FPS
126
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1579
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Buy for €1,829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
52nd Variation
52nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
52nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
69%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
52nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
97%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |