Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 94% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 200 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than EMCA4 - €899.0 vs €1769.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - €8.73 vs €8.85 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
51st Variation
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.85/FPS
98.64406779661017%
Price, €
€1769
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63596 minutes ago
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63600 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
51st Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
18.559617058311574%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24.738935852809547%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
5th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
76.13508442776735%
Multi-Core
8539
57.50942887931034%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
