Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 183 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Megaport - €1769.0 vs €2829.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €9.67 vs €16.54 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
51st Variation
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1769
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314 minutes ago
49th Variation
FPS
171
93.44262295081968%
Value, €/FPS
€16.54/FPS
58.46432889963724%
Price, €
€2829
62%
Buy for €2,829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
51st Variation
49th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
49th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
43.08093994778068%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
68.92093485827945%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
85.74646074646076%
Multi-Core
14848
70.56363463549093%
49th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
