Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 70% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 192 vs 113 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 46% cheaper than EMCA4 - €859.00 vs €1579.00
- Up to 8% better value when playing No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - €7.60 vs €8.22 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7560 minutes ago
Buy for €859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7562 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
52nd Variation
17th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
17th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
29%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
52nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
100%
Multi-Core
11527
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
