Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper CyberpowerPC Wyvern on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing CyberpowerPC Wyvern is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 122% better in No Man's Sky than CyberpowerPC Wyvern - 200 vs 90 FPS
Advantages of CyberpowerPC Wyvern PC
- Up to 57% cheaper than EMCA4 - €759.55 vs €1769.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - €8.44 vs €8.85 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4543 minutes ago
2nd Variation
FPS
90
45%
Value, €/FPS
€8.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€759.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €759.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
51st Variation
2nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
51st Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
24%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
51st Variation
Core i5-13600K
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2665
100%
Multi-Core
14848
100%
CPU Winner
2nd Variation
Core i5-10400F
2.9 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1438
53%
Multi-Core
5751
38%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | CyberpowerPC Wyvern PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-13600K | CPU | Core i5-10400F |
Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |