Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 44% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 192 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1499.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - €7.81 vs €12.4 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
47th Variation
FPS
133
69.27083333333334%
Value, €/FPS
€12.4/FPS
62.98387096774193%
Price, €
€1649
90%
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76360 minutes ago
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
47th Variation
42nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
47th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
50.6215173596228%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
40.500685871056234%
42nd Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
47th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
42nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
91.06739761367301%
Multi-Core
16743
79.72857142857143%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900K | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900 |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |