Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Tiburcc outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1580.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - €9.63 vs €10.55 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
46th Variation
FPS
161
98.17073170731707%
Value, €/FPS
€10.55/FPS
91.27962085308057%
Price, €
€1699
92%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3994 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1580
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,580 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
46th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
46th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
46th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
null-core
Single-Core
2719
95.2697967764541%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
null-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
97.60084365937253%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Tiburcc Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
