Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 344% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - 120 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 48% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Megaport - €14.16 vs €27.37 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 57% cheaper than EMCA4 - €739.0 vs €1699.0
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
46th Variation
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€14.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1699
43%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 770 minutes ago
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 772 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
46th Variation
31st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
46th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
31st Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
43.08080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
35.894660894660895%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
46th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
31st Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
57.190143435086426%
Multi-Core
6199
40.858159767993676%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
