Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 16% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 113 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - €7.07 vs €8.24 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
45th Variation
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74016 minutes ago
48th Variation
FPS
97
85.84070796460178%
Value, €/FPS
€8.24/FPS
85.80097087378641%
Price, €
€799
100%
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
45th Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
45th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72.22692633361558%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84.2506350550381%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
45th Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
100%
Multi-Core
8910
91.58186864014802%
CPU Winner
48th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
96.80511182108627%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-12400F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
