Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 97% better in New World than Megaport - 148 vs 75 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 3% better value when playing New World than EMCA4 - €16.25 vs €16.75 per FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
44th Variation
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.75/FPS
97.01492537313433%
Price, €
FPS Winner
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 623 minutes ago
40th Variation
FPS
75
50.67567567567568%
Value, €/FPS
€16.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1229
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,229 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 623 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
44th Variation
40th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
40th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
41.351540616246496%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
28.946078431372545%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
null-core
Single-Core
2918
100%
Multi-Core
19633
100%
CPU Winner
40th Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
null-core
Single-Core
2178
74.6401644962303%
Multi-Core
10263
52.274232160138546%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |