Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 51% cheaper than Megaport - €899.00 vs €1829.00
- Up to 35% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €6.92 vs €10.57 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 33% better in No Man's Sky than EMCA4 - 173 vs 130 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for €1,829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
4th Variation
52nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
83%
Texel Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
74%
52nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
52nd Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
