Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 113% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 196 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 21% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €11.22 vs €14.12 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 41% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1299.00 vs €2199.00
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
42nd Variation
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2199
59%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
42nd Variation
40th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
42nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
40th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
29%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
42nd Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2923
100%
Multi-Core
17849
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
