Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 30% cheaper than Megaport - €1099.0 vs €1569.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - €7.74 vs €10.6 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 148 vs 142 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14703 minutes ago
Buy for €1,569 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14702 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
41st Variation
39th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
41st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
39th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
95%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
39th Variation
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2179
100%
Multi-Core
11883
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 9 5900X |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
