Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 122% better in F1 23 than - 184 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 50% better value when playing F1 23 than - €5.97 vs €12.04 per FPS
Advantages of Computer PC
- Up to 9% cheaper than EMCA4 - €999.0 vs €1099.0
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
41st Variation
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2626 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
83
45.108695652173914%
Value, €/FPS
€12.04/FPS
49.584717607973424%
Price, €
€999
100%
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2629 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
41st Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
41st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
22.83754822117445%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
15.987654320987652%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
41st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Core i9-9900KF
null-core
Single-Core
1691
79.72654408297973%
Multi-Core
8053
82.77315243087676%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i9-9900KF |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
