Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 171% better in Starfield than Megaport - 84 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 28% better value when playing Starfield than Megaport - €42.85 vs €59.65 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1849.0 vs €3599.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€42.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3599
51%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for €1,849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
37%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
24%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
4.5 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2938
100%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
