Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 61% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Megaport - 221 vs 137 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 60% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1449.0 vs €3599.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - €10.58 vs €16.29 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
3rd Variation
FPS
221
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.29/FPS
64.94782074892572%
Price, €
€3599
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1093 minutes ago
48th Variation
FPS
137
61.990950226244344%
Value, €/FPS
€10.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1449
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
3rd Variation
48th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
48th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
35.71589627959414%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
35.30232558139535%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
4.5 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2938
100%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
CPU Winner
48th Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2362
80.39482641252553%
Multi-Core
11527
59.7470585186337%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
