Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 62% better in Dead Space than Megaport - 167 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 51% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1749.0 vs €3599.0
- Up to 21% better value when playing Dead Space than EMCA4 - €16.98 vs €21.55 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
27th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
27th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
35%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
35%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
4.5 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2938
100%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700X |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
