Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 64% better in No Man's Sky than Megaport - 169 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 26% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Megaport - €6.5 vs €8.73 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than EMCA4 - €899.0 vs €1099.0
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
31st Variation
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1099
81%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1244 minutes ago
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
31st Variation
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
31st Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
34%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
31st Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
100%
Multi-Core
10263
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
