Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than Megaport - 76 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Starfield than Megaport - €27.62 vs €33.31 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 14% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1799.00 vs €2099.00
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
26th Variation
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€27.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2099
85%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for €1,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
26th Variation
46th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
26th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
46th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
58%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
26th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2923
100%
Multi-Core
17849
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7900X | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
