Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 132% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 255 vs 110 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 64% cheaper than EMCA4 - €749.00 vs €2099.00
- Up to 17% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - €6.81 vs €8.23 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €2,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 513 minutes ago
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 514 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
26th Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
26th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
25%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
25%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
26th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900X
4.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2923
100%
Multi-Core
17849
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7900X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |