Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - 125 vs 120 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1339.0 vs €1449.0
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EMCA4 - €10.71 vs €12.07 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
20th Variation
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 430770 minutes ago
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
20th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
20th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
20th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600X
4.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2863
100%
Multi-Core
12807
82.75928917609046%
CPU Winner
50th Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
92.94446384910933%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |